Oxfam’s SodaStream’s Global Ambassador.
Scarlett Johansson quit as an Oxfam Global Ambassador last week, amid growing concerns about her connection with the Israeli company SodaStream. Johansson had held the post with Oxfam for more than eight years, drawing attention to the impact of natural disasters and helping in the organization’s fund raising efforts. But Johansson’s ties to SodaStream, which has a factory in an illegal Jewish settlement of Maale Adumim in the West Bank, had drawn criticism.
Johansson’s statement, issued Wednesday, said that she had “respectfully decided to end her ambassador role with Oxfam,” adding that “She and Oxfam have a fundamental difference of opinion in regards to the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement. She is very proud of her accomplishments and fundraising during her tenure with Oxfam.” Oxfam responded with a statement declaring that Oxfam “respects the independence of [its] ambassadors” but noting that “Ms Johansson’s role promoting the company SodaStream is incompatible with her role as an Oxfam Global Ambassador.”
Johansson countered, maintaining that “SodaStream is a company that is not only committed to the environment but to building a bridge to peace between Israel and Palestine, supporting neighbours working alongside each other, receiving equal pay, equal benefits and equal rights.”
Johansson has been critizied as naïve and irresponsible for endorsing SodaStream. But many of the company’s Palestinian employees argue that a boycott of SodaStream and other Israeli companies could have unintended negative impacts on their ability to earn a living.
It’s not the first time that a celebrity has come under fire for their position a global issue. Less than a month ago, Dennis Rodman’s trip to North Korea—under the self-promoted label of “basketball diplomacy”—was rounding criticized. But many A-listers have used their celebrity to draw attention to important global issues. Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Matt Damon, and others have all used their star power to draw attention to issues they feel strongly about.
What do you think? What are the advantages and disadvantages of Hollywood stars campaigning on global issues? Do you think that their celebrity helps or hurts their causes? Why? And with respect to this case, was Johansson right to terminate her relationship with Oxfam in favor of her ties with SodaStream? Why?
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putting last week ordered the release of several high profile prisoners over the past two weeks in an effort to improve the country’s beleaguered human rights record ahead of the 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Saatchi. Billionaire (and former political rival to Putin) Mikhail Khodorkovsky fled Russia and sought asylum in Germany. Thirty members of Greenpeace arrested for protesting Russian drilling operations in the Arctic were also freed, as were two members of the Russian punk rock group Pussy Riot.
But the move appears to have had little success, and the two members of the group took to the media to call for a “Putin-free system.”
Meanwhile, President Obama named several gay and lesbian athletes as part of the US Olympic delegation, and other international leaders have announced their intention to boycott the games. But many people are asking whether a boycott will make a difference.
What do you think? Will a boycott of the Winter Olympic Games affect human rights policy in Russia? Should the United States boycott the Olympics? Why?
Political debates over the Olympic Games have swirled around Beijing. The Olympic torch relay—a tradition started by Hitler in the 1936 Games—was marred by protest. Nongovernmental organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have called for boycotts of the Games to protest China’s Tibet policy. But the intersection of the Games and politics is nothing new. Today, I give you the top five moments in Olympic political history:
5. Dueling Boycotts. The 1980 Olympic Games were hosted in Moscow. Less than a year earlier, the Soviet Union had invaded Afghanistan, sparking an international standoff between American-backed Taliban militias and the Soviet-backed government of Afghanistan. In protest of the Soviet move, the United States led a 62-nation boycott of the Moscow Olympics. Four years later, the Soviets turned the table, with a tit-for-tat boycott of the Los Angeles Olympics.
4. Blood in the Water Match. In 1956, a Hungarian nationalist uprising threatened to move Hungary from the Soviet bloc. The Soviet Union sent more than 200,000 soldiers across the border to put down the uprising, leading to violent conflicts in the street. The Hungarian water polo team, the world’s defending champions, were forced to flee the country during the uprising, and made their way to the Melbourne Olympics without knowing the outcome of the invasion. When they faced off against Soviet water polo team, the match was violent. Thousands of spectators cheered the Hungarian team and jeered the Soviets. Both teams were trading blows in the pool. Leading 4-0 with just a few minutes to go, the referees were forced to stop the match after Soviet Valentin Prokopov struck Hungarian star Ervin Zadov above the left eye, causing blood to stream down his face and into the pool.
3. Munich Massacre. The 1972 Munich Olympics were the first Games held in Germany since Hitler’s 1936 Berlin Games. The West German government used the motto “The Happy Games” and hoped to use the tournament to present to the world the democratic and optimistic West Germany. Instead, the Games were marred by the murder of 11 Israeli athletes by the Palestinian terrorist group Black September. After a one-day suspension, the Games continued. After the Games concluded, the Israeli government launched Operation Wrath of God and Operation Spring of Youth to track down and kill those responsible for the massacre.
2. Tommie Smith and John Carols’ Black Power Salute. The 1968 Olympic Games were hosted in Mexico City. But in the United States, the civil rights movement was in full swing. African Americans were fighting racial discrimination. After winning the gold and bronze medals in the 200 meters, Smith and Carlos received their medals on the podium shoeless but wearing black socks to symbolize black poverty, black scarves to symbolize black pride, and a single black glove on a hand raised in salute. Both men received death threats after the act and were ostracized by the US sporting establishment.
1. Jesse Owens’ Four Gold Medals. Hosted by Adolph Hitler’s Nazi Germany, the 1936 were intended to demonstrate to the world both the power of the Third Reich and the supremacy of Nazi ideology. When the African American Jesse Owens won four gold medals and set two world records and two Olympic records in the process—a feat not repeated until Carl Lewis performance in the 1984 Olympic games—Hitler’s propaganda mission suffered a serious blow.
Posted in Almond Comparative Politics Today 9/e, Almond Comparative Politics Today: ATF 5/e, Art/Jervis International Politics 9/e, Danziger Understanding the Political World 9/e, Draper The Good Society, Goldstein International Relations 8/e, Goldstein International Relations Brief 4/e, Nye Understanding International Conflicts 7/e, Roskin Countries and Concepts 10/e, Roskin IR 7/e, Viotti International Relations and World Politics 4/e
Tagged Adolph Hitler, Afghanistan, Black Power, Black September, boycott, China, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Jesse Owens, John Carols, Olympics, Palestine, Soviet Union, Tommie Smith, United States